Skip to content

EN 1621-2, the back protector document

The standard a certified back protector is marked against. Same principle as limb armour — a force measured through the protector — with coverage types of its own.

What it measures, and where the confusion starts

A defined impact, a sensor beneath the protector, and thresholds on the force transmitted. It is the same measurement principle as the limb standard, published as a separate document because the part of the body, the area and the requirements differ. The two are frequently quoted interchangeably in listings, and they are not the same document.

Type B and type FB

Coverage is classified separately. Type B covers the back over a defined area; type FB covers a larger area, extending to the shoulders and the lower back. Coverage is also sized, and the size decides whether a protector actually spans a given torso — one sized for a shorter back leaves the lower part uncovered.

The placeholder problem this standard exposes

A great many jackets ship with a foam pad in the back pocket rather than a certified protector. The pad keeps the pocket in shape and carries no marking. A certified protector carries the standard, the level, the type and a size printed on it, which makes the check a matter of looking rather than of asking.

Insert or harness

A protector can be an insert sized for a jacket pocket, or a separate garment on its own harness. The insert only works if the pocket holds it flat over the spine; the harness stays where it is put regardless of what is worn over it, at the cost of bulk and warmth. Both are certified against the same document.

Questions riders send in about this

Can I put any protector in any jacket pocket?

Protectors are sized and pockets are sized, and neither is standardised between brands. The pocket measurement is what to shop with.

Is a level 1 harness better than a level 2 insert?

They differ on two independent properties — transmitted force, and whether the protector stays over the spine. This site reports both as published and does not reduce them to one ranking.

Last reviewed 18 September 2026